Skip to content

Map, Glossary and Index

The opening note states the book's question and how to read it. The maps, contents, glossary and index below lead back into the chapters.

Reader's Map

Return here for choices and arguments, contents, terms, roles and cases, subjects, or diagrams. Each is a way into the chapters, not a separate source of constitutional rules.

The order is editorial: provision and ordinary freedom come before the powers and failures that threaten them. The rules' dependency order is a separate technical matter explained in the method's section A refusal is a result about an input.

The choices and their arguments

Use this map to put a mechanism beside its justification. The case chapters show consequences of the rules and the recorded evidence; each closes with an argument explaining why I choose its rule and what would favour a different arrangement, and Part V draws the choices together.

Where a decision belongs

The protected core is what constitutional amendment must preserve. An institutional mechanism, such as an appointment procedure, is a chosen means of serving those commitments. It binds the government while in force, but it can be changed through the lawful amendment route while preserving the core. A rule's current constitutional status does not make it unamendable.

The book distinguishes five kinds of question. A constitutional invariant binds every public decision. A democratic choice belongs to public law within those limits. A protected private or civic freedom belongs to people without an official prescribing the result. An operation concerns the staff, resources and work needed to put a decision into practice. An external assumption concerns something this design cannot guarantee, such as an honest witness or cooperation from another state. One subject can contain all five. Calling a constitutional defect an operating problem does not resolve it.

Public duties distinguish respecting a right, protecting it from interference, fulfilling the public floor, maintaining continuity and remedying a breach. Each duty belongs to the body, function, jurisdiction and scope its lawful source names. None shows that the body acts. The chapters keep a duty, a lawful action and evidence of its result distinct.

Annotated contents

The epigraph and the opening note precede the chapters. The numbered chapters form the main reading sequence; the method and this reference material follow them.

Part I — Who counts, and what they are owed

Part II — The life the design leaves alone

Part III — The public power that serves it

Part IV — What the design does to a person, and how it catches itself

Part V — The argument

  • Opening case: After the Judgment — the Wallacedene families after their judgment, and a litigant who died in her shack before her house was built.
  • Chapter 29: The Five Joints — the commitments beneath the choices, what the design adds, and how the choices fit together and trade off over valuation, rotation, coercion, capture and the state.
  • Chapter 30: Where This Could Fail — the failures that cross chapters, ranked by an argued order, each with the evidence that would show it, what the design does now and what a fix would take.

Back matter

  • The Method — worked rules, queries, refusals and contradiction checks; what each assurance covers and where it stops; and instructions for running the book's examples.
  • Works Cited — every work the notes cite, in alphabetical order, with the chapters that cite it.
  • This map, glossary and index, with the diagrams and an alphabetical index of terms, bodies, people and cases.

Concise glossary

  • Entry: a report given to the rules, such as a birth, judgment or receipt.
  • Record: the entries given to the rules to read. Its vocabulary can be restricted while its contents are false, incomplete or stale.
  • Rule: a route from specified premises to a conclusion. It does not verify the premises for itself.
  • Conclusion: what follows from the exact rules and the record being checked; not an observation of the world.
  • Properly made: said of a finding, order or review whose every required element is present, each from the right source. The elements vary by kind; they typically include the subject, case and ground, the evidence and procedure, and separate people authorised to decide and to review. Without one of them it is incomplete, and its consequences do not follow.
  • In force: having legal effect now, rather than merely appearing in the record. A completed finding stays in force until a properly made act, such as restoration on appeal, ends it; an authority stays in force only while its source and review remain current.
  • Version in force: the one current version of the record whose entries have legal effect. A finding recorded in an earlier version counts only where it is kept, with independent witnesses, in the version in force.
  • Person: the status from which the floor follows. A birth or encounter can ground it; custody and release provide independent backstops.
  • Standing: the universal status every person holds. It is neither a rank nor permission to act on someone.
  • Public answerability: continuing accountability to examination and exposure, held by public bodies and people who have been seated in office.
  • Current lawful authority: permission for a named holder to exercise one exact power in a jurisdiction and scope under the version of the record in force. Answerability alone does not give it.
  • Custody authorisation and its review date: permission to hold one person under one case, tied to its constitutional source and to a review period. The period has an order but no measured length; its end is the review date. Unless a renewal is made by then, the authority ends; its ending is not itself a release.
  • Political home: the chosen local connection from which a resident's regional and common democratic home follows. Compelled placement cannot move it.
  • Authority to sign findings: a permission, concluded by the rules rather than simply recorded, for an examiner's finding to count in the paired credibility-finding route.
  • Floor: what every person is owed without conditions of employment, registration, belonging, payment or approved behaviour.
  • Bodily safety: freedom from violence and threats to the person; a floor item guaranteed as protection rather than shown by a receipt.
  • Material security: the essential goods a person needs beyond food and shelter; a floor item whose delivery can be concluded from a receipt and an independent witness.
  • Protected core: standing, the floor and other specified human rights, commons and direct animal protections that lawful constitutional amendment must preserve. It does not include every present institution.
  • Institutional mechanism: a chosen arrangement for making, implementing or reviewing decisions. Its justification is separate from the right it serves.
  • Delivery: the protected condition reaching a person. A debt, payment or institutional output is not enough to show it.
  • Receipt: a report of delivery. The ordinary receipt route needs matching independent evidence before delivery can be concluded.
  • Contribution record: an entry that someone paid into a named scheme. It supports a supplement, never standing, the floor, the vote or liberty.
  • Supplement: protection through a scheme or public guarantee against a recorded event it covers. The conclusion states no amount and proves no payment.
  • Competence certificate: an authorised attestation of a person's competence for a function. No other entitlement or permission in the formal record depends on it; it is not a licence.
  • Compensation record: a promised wage, profit, return, grant, prize, subsidy or incentive. A compensation conclusion also needs an attestation by someone other than the payer, naming the payer and the kind on one basis; neither entry states an amount.
  • Public-scale finding: a finding that one private function carries public duties on a named constitutional ground. It does not bind every activity of the organisation.
  • Named ground: the reason a public-scale finding must show, such as essentiality, dominance, gatekeeping or absence of real exit. Size alone is not a ground.
  • Shield: protection against conviction-based imprisonment following an exposure of authority, while no deceit finding in force applies to that exposure. It does not reach a case whose two timing witnesses both record that the disclosure came after that case's charge. An unrelated case requires a finding by authorised reviewers whose eligibility is positively shown. An actual conflict blocks the affected decision; merely naming a reviewer does not.
  • Signing restriction: a credibility finding in force prevents its subject's signature from counting toward a new credibility finding. Other offices are unaffected. It leaves the floor intact; restoration identifies the case and its ground.
  • Correction: a claim is assessed on its own grounds. A credibility finding does not erase unrelated contributions.
  • Placement: reviewed authority for a named place of confinement, requiring evidence of availability and lawful conditions. It does not show that anyone was moved there or received shelter.
  • Breach marker: a conclusion naming a defect in the record. It does not itself investigate, correct, compensate or release anyone.
  • Democratic corridor: the range of public choices within constitutional invariants and protected freedoms, with review and peaceful change.

Roles, bodies, and cases

Roles and bodies

  • The State and the constitutional bodies: the record's State owes the floor. The republic's constitutional bodies hold separately specified duties and powers; the name State does not stand for proof that they operate. See Chapters 3, 6 and 17.
  • The federal constitutional bodies: the People's Assembly, Regions Council, Executive Council, Civic President, courts and independent offices exercise distinct functions. Each power rests on a current source; the rules do not show actual staffing or independence. See Chapter 17.
  • The electorate and convocation: separate sources of seating, and so of the authority to sign findings used in accountability. See Chapters 16 and 24.
  • An examiner or auditor: records examinations. The authority to sign and case-specific independence are needed before an examination can count toward an adverse finding. A finding against the examiner needs its own case. See Chapters 9 and 24.
  • The court: records a judgment. That alone gives no current authority to confine. See Chapters 23 and 27.
  • The review and appeals bodies: receive specified findings, challenges and duties to act; a failure to respond, separately shown, can activate an alternate. See Chapters 21 and 28.
  • The assembly and approving-public entries: report a proposal and approval. They give no separate law-making status. The federal republic's certified result and exact candidate need their own authority and review. See Chapter 22.
  • The timing service and the temporal witnesses: give separately scoped timing, source and review evidence. An input cannot vouch for its own honesty or continued arrival. See Chapters 2, 24 and 27.

Principal named cases

The names identify formal test cases, not interviews or biographies. Nell, Hano, Ruk, Bela, Cira, Esa, Adam, Ivo, Kel and Mael recur across chapters; every other name appears only in its home chapter, the one listed for it here. A fact added in one test is stated there and does not become a life history that follows the name into the next. Each chapter states the evidence relevant there. This index gives the principal roles for finding a case again.

Case and roles Question Return to
Nell, whose only initial entry is a birth; Ori, with no standing entry What gives a person standing? 1
Marisol, with a food receipt and a matching observation by an independent witness What shows that provision arrived? 4
Juno, met at first contact and followed through every office that fails to act What does each failure leave owed, and to whom? 6
Selin, present in the jurisdiction with adulthood evidence, followed through one week; Teo, Selin's child Which rules touch an ordinary week, and what must be written before they do? 7
Coll, wage recipient; Marlo, supplement claimant; the subject of a competence certificate What evidence supports each separate claim? 9
Bela, subject of a credibility finding and teacher of Cira What changes for the teacher, and what does not transfer to the learner? 9, 24
Esa, a teacher and the child of a parent who judges Esa What does an activity or family relationship show about age? 18
A parent who teaches their child, a paid carer and a census worker Whose contribution is recorded? 9
An examiner who examines Adam and cites a ground Does citing a ground give the authority to sign? 9
Koa, with a recorded examination of Esa but no public answerability Does an examination make its author answerable, or an auditor? 16
Tove, a recalled official; Iris, who exposed Tove Why does answerability survive recall? 16
Nia, with relief under a properly made appellate order; Ruk, without it in the comparison How does a duty to hear differ from relief already granted? 21
Two examiners, each holding the authority to sign through a different seating body Who may sign a credibility finding? 24
Mael, seated, but denied the authority to sign by a finding from an earlier version of the record, kept in the version in force Why does personal restoration leave a separate appointment restriction? 24
Faro, defendant and discloser; Pax, injured person and disclosure target Does exposing a private person open the shield? 23
Lior and Kel, defendants exposing the court in separate cases What changes when this exposure has a properly made deceit finding? 23
Dara, defendant with two disclosures, and the person Dara injured Can a finding about one disclosure defeat another, or the prosecution proceed separately? 23
The two examiners of Bela's paired finding What must a paired credibility finding contain? 24
A parent who examined their own child, and signer pairs tied by parentage or marriage What does a family tie bar, and what needs a separate case? 24
Edo, subject of a finding for deceiving another person, then a proposed examiner Can earlier clearance override a current restriction on signing? 24
Zed, subject of a properly made custody case; Ivo, injured person Does custody preserve standing without another recorded root? 25
Ruk, with a finding of grave injury; another defendant, with a finding of aggravated cruelty; both with authorised secure placements What makes an offence severe, and does severity choose the place? 26
Ruk, eligible for home confinement but authorised for a secure place Which reported placements conflict with the authority in force? 26, 28
A defendant with no home option recorded and a reviewed supported residence Does a missing home entry decide where a person is held? 26
Adam and Kel, with reviewed supported residences Why is a placement record not a shelter receipt? 26, 27
Hano, held under a properly made custody case What is required to restrict movement, and what remains protected? 18, 27
Jala, with a recorded injury to Ivo but no conviction Does sharing an injury entry with a convicted person's case restrict movement? 27

Documented historical cases open each Part and support the chapters' argument sections; Part V draws them together in Chapter 29's arguments over valuation, rotation, coercion, capture and the state.

Domains and chapters

This is a subject index. A chapter's presence means it addresses the subject, not that it specifies every institution or proves that a service operates.

Subject Main chapters
Personhood and life course Standing (1), care and agency (14), adulthood (18)
Body, health, care, family and intimacy The floor (3), relationships and support (14)
Learning, media, science, religion and culture Protected freedoms (8), contribution (9)
Food, housing, land, utilities and infrastructure Delivery (4), scarcity (5), public duties (6)
Employment, property, enterprise, money, credit and public finance Earning (9), economic limits (10)
Democracy, government and administration Institutions (17), the vote (18), amendment (22)
Justice, safety and repair Access and remedy (21), custody and protective powers (27), institutional correction (28)
Records, surveillance and automated decisions Evidence (2), record powers (19), public safety (27)
Locality, mobility, migration and external relations Arrival and belonging (15), political home (18), external powers (20)
Emergencies, security and defence Crises (20), protective powers (27)
Equality and discrimination Equal routes, accommodation and remedy (11)
Environment, future conditions and animals Ecological rights (12), animal protection (13)
Friendship, leisure, mutual aid and associations Private and civic freedom (8), voluntary provision (6), relationships (14)

Accessible diagrams

These reading aids describe relationships, not proof that an event or action occurs. Each has a prose equivalent, and none depends on colour.

From the world to a conclusion

Text diagram: event → reported entry → rule → conclusion.

Prose equivalent: An event must be reported before the rules can read it. The rules settle what follows from the report, not that the event occurred. At first contact, the record may use a temporary encounter name so the floor can begin without a civil identity match. That name does not authenticate an identity or import another person's history. A conclusion still needs a separate action if it is to change anyone's circumstances.

The duty chain

The duty chain: a person is owed the floor; the common tier, the region and the locality each owe part of it; a certified failure passes continuity up a tier; a pattern of failure goes to the Constitutional Court.

Prose equivalent: Standing, from a birth, first contact, presence, effective control or a report that nobody is acting for the person, makes each of the nine floor items an entitlement of that person and a debt of the State (Chapter 3). The common tier finances, equalises and sets minimum standards, and backstops the floor for everyone; a region provides, and a locality reaches and delivers, where a witness authorised for the person records them present (Chapter 6). When a source and an independent reviewer, neither of them the failing body, certify a failure, the publicly answerable tier they name assumes continuity, and the failing body still owes its own duty. A certified pattern of failure goes to the Constitutional Court, whose declaration obliges the Assembly to plan and, if the Assembly does not answer, the Court to order interim measures that secure the minimum. Each arrow is a duty; whether anyone acted is a separate fact.

Delivery evidence

Delivery evidence: a receipt, an authorisation of the witness for the recipient and a matching observation, from a witness held apart from the source and from every body that owes the floor, conclude delivery of that item.

Prose equivalent: Delivery of one item to one person is concluded when three entries match: a receipt saying the person received the item from a source, an authorisation of a witness for that person, and that witness's observation of the same item at its scope. The witness must be neither the source nor a body that owes the floor: the State, the common tier, or the person's recorded region or locality (Chapter 4). A provider's own receipt and observation conclude nothing. Bodily safety, expression and belief have no delivery route; protective duties answer them. The conclusion rests on the entries, so a false entry in the required shape concludes the same thing.

The placement ceiling

The placement ceiling: a finding of severity in the case raises the most restrictive place that may be considered to a secure place; without it the ceiling is home confinement or ordinary supported residence; every place still needs its own findings.

Prose equivalent: A lawful sentence is the start: the merits, the custody authorisation and its review period are properly made for the case. An adjudicated finding of grave injury or aggravated cruelty in that case allows a secure place to be considered beside home confinement and ordinary supported residence; without it, the most restrictive place is ordinary supported residence. Victim counts, raw acts, family, wealth and poverty never raise the ceiling. Whatever the ceiling, the chosen place needs its own availability, individual necessity, lawful conditions and independent review, and a secure place also needs a finding that less restrictive places are insufficient (Chapter 26).

The democratic corridor

The democratic corridor: ordinary public choice runs inside amendable constitutional law, inside a protected core no amendment may remove.

Prose equivalent: Public choices must respect the floor and protected freedoms. A protected core, among them standing, the floor, equality, due process, core liberties, the commons, the animal core, the absolute prohibitions and an Assembly and Court able to sit, is beyond amendment. The rest of the constitution changes only with two-thirds of the full Assembly and more affirmative than negative valid referendum votes, with regional approvals where the federal settlement is directly affected (Chapter 22). The rules distinguish an authorised decision from its certified result, and both from publication and selection into force. Independent review and peaceful change remain necessary. No arrow proves that an election was run or that its recorded result is true.

Six ways a fact is kept from a consequence

Six ways a fact is kept from a consequence: closed inputs, conclusions nobody may write, purpose-bound reads, endpoints nothing reads, no confinement from absence and scope binding.

Prose equivalent: A fact about a person reaches a consequence for them only through six constraints. Only admitted kinds of entry may be written; custody, ballot and answerability conclusions may only be derived; a contribution or pay record may be read only for its own purpose; duties, deliveries and recorded losses feed no further rule; no rule confines anyone for a missing floor condition or a missing home, family or work entry; and a finding about one subject, case or record cannot be lent to another. Each is checked on the written form of the rules, as the method's section Six ways a fact is kept from a consequence explains, so a rule reaching the same consequence another way needs its own check.

Institutions and accountability

Text diagram: authorised act → separate examination → challenge → independent review → correction.

Prose equivalent: A body must have authority for its act. A different body examines it, an affected person retains a route to contest it, and review has to be capable of correction. A recorded separation of roles does not prove actual independence, availability or a completed remedy.

Index

The principal places for each term, body, person and documented case. Numbers are chapters; opening is the opening note, Part I case and the like are the documented cases that open the Parts, and method is the optional method. A common term lists the chapters that use it most.

A

  • Aadhaar: opening, 1, 4, 29
  • accommodation: 2, 5, 6, 11, 13, 15, 21, 27
  • Adam: 2, 8, 9, 10, 11, 26, 27, method
  • adulthood: 1, 2, 7, 9, 14, 15, 18, 28
  • advocate for the person: 6, 12, 14, 17, 30
  • alternate, independent: 6, 14, 15, 19
  • amendment: 13, Part III case, 17, 18, 22, 29, method
  • Anderson, Elizabeth: 29
  • Animal Protection Advocate: 13, method
  • animals: 3, 6, 12, 13, 15, 22, 29, method
  • answerability, public: 2, 3, 6, 16, 17, 23, 24, 29
  • appeal: 15, 16, 21, 23, 24
  • appointment: 6, 14, 17, 23, 24, 29, 30, method
  • asylum: 15, 27
  • authority to sign findings: 2, 3, 9, 16, 24

B

  • ballot: 7, 12, 13, 14, 15, 18, 25, method
  • Bela: 3, 4, 9, 18, 24, 25, 28
  • belief: 1, 3, 4, 8, 25, method
  • bodily safety: opening, 1, 3, 4, 7, 21, 25, 27

C

  • care: 3, 4, 7, 9, 13, 14, 27, 29
  • child with nobody: opening, 1, 5, 29
  • childcare-benefits affair: 2
  • Cira: 9, 11, 14, 24
  • Civic President: 16, 17
  • common tier: 3, 4, 6, 10, 16, 17, 30
  • commons: 10, 12, 13, 17, 29
  • company: 1, 3, 4, 8, 25, 28
  • compensation: 9, 10, 20, method
  • competence certificate: 9, method
  • confinement: 18, 21, 23, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29
  • Constitutional Court: Part I case, 6, 17, 20, 22
  • continuity: 5, 6, 10, 12, 14, 17, 28, 29
  • contradiction check: method
  • contribution: 6, 9, 10, 22, 29, method
  • correction: 5, 6, 10, 14, 15, 19, 28, 29
  • credibility finding: 2, 9, 11, 16, 18, 23, 24, 29
  • custody: 18, 21, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, method
  • custody authorisation: 10, 25, 26, 27, method

D

  • Dara: 23
  • delivery: opening, 1, 3, 4, 6, 7, 29, method
  • disclosure: 17, 23, 24, 27
  • discrimination: 11, 28

E

  • ecology: 3, 12, 13, 15, 29, 30
  • Edo: 24
  • emergency: 5, 10, Part III case, 17, 20
  • entitlement: opening, 1, 3, 5, 6, 18, 29, method
  • equality: 10, 11, 13, 17, 29
  • Esa: 2, 14, 16, 18
  • eviction: 6, 7, 10, 18, 26, 29
  • Executive Council: 16, 17, 20
  • expression: 3, 4, 8, 18, 25

F

  • family: opening, Part I case, 1, 2, 5, 14, 26, method
  • Faro: 23
  • first contact: opening, 1, 2, 6, 14, 25, 30
  • floor: 1, 3, 6, 9, 10, 25, 29, 30
  • food: 1, 3, 4, 6, 9, 13, 25, method
  • free movement: 6, 7, 9, 15, 18, 24, 25, 27
  • future conditions: 3, 5, 12, 13
  • Future Conditions Guardian: 12, 13

G

  • Grootboom: Part I case, 6, Part V case

H

  • Hano: 2, 3, 18, 26, 27, 28
  • harm: 2, 5, 8, 12, 13, 15, 26, 27

I

  • initiation duty: 6, 14, 29
  • Iris: 16
  • Ivo: 25, 27

J

  • Jala: 27
  • Juno: 6

K

  • Kel: 21, 23, 26, 27
  • Kesavananda Bharati: 22
  • Koa: 16
  • Kumari, Santoshi: opening

L

  • learning: 1, 4, 7, 8, 9, 14, 27
  • Lior: 23
  • locality: 3, 4, 6, 17, 30
  • lottery: 5, 29

M

  • Mael: 16, 24
  • Marisol: 4
  • material security: opening, 1, 3, 4, 7, 21, 25, 27
  • membership: 8, 15, 17, 18, 27, 28

N

  • Nell: 1, 2, 4, 14, 18, 21, 25, 28
  • Nia: 21, method
  • Nissenbaum, Helen: 2, method
  • non-refoulement: 27

O

  • Ori: 1
  • Ostrom, Elinor: 29

P

  • People's Assembly: 6, 16, 17, 20, 22, 25, 29, 30
  • personhood: 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 9, 18, 25
  • Pettit, Philip: 7, 29
  • placement: 2, 11, 25, 26, 27, 28
  • political home: 15, 18, 28
  • presence: 1, 3, 4, 7, 15, 25
  • prisoner: opening, 2, 18, Part IV case, 25, 28, 29, method
  • privacy: 3, 7, 13, 14, 27
  • property: 9, 10, 12, 13, 14, 20, 27
  • protected core: 10, 11, 22
  • public finance: 2, 5, 6, 10, 17, 28, 29, 30

R

  • recall: 16, 17, 23, 24, 29
  • receipt: 1, 3, 4, 6, 7, 25, 26, 27
  • recognition status: 5, 9, 20, 22, 24, 26, 27, method
  • region: 3, 4, 6, 10, 17, 20
  • Regions Council: 16, 17, 20, 22
  • release: opening, 1, 19, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29
  • remedy: 6, 10, 11, 15, 19, 21, 27, 29
  • requisition: 20
  • residence: 15, 17, 18, 26
  • restoration: 9, 12, 13, 16, 20, 21, 24
  • Robodebt: 2
  • Ruk: 21, 26, 28, method

S

  • scarcity: 5, 6, 12, 28, 29, 30
  • search: 7, 19, 29
  • secure placement: 2, 26, 27, 28
  • Selin: 7
  • Sen, Amartya: opening, 5, 29
  • severity: 2, 13, 22, 25, 26, 27, 29
  • shelter: 1, 3, 4, 7, 13, 25, 26, 27
  • shield: 2, 3, 16, 23, 24, 29, method
  • Shue, Henry: opening, 3, 29
  • signing restriction: 23, 24
  • single-actor route: 13
  • standing: 1, 2, 6, 9, 11, 25, 28, 29
  • subsidiarity: 17
  • supplement: 2, 9, 24, 29, method
  • surveillance: 19, 27
  • SyRI: 2

T

  • Teo: 7
  • Tove: 16

U

  • Urgenda: 12

V

  • versions of the record: 2, 9, 16, 22, 24, 28, 30, method

W

  • wage: 7, 9, 24, 29
  • witness: 3, 4, 7, 14, 23, 24, 28, method
  • work: 2, 3, 6, 7, 9, 26, 27, 29

Z

  • Zed: 25, method
dhilipsiva · prose CC BY 4.0MarkdownSources & licencesAgent index